Published 6/2/2009
by Mark Murray
at First Read
MINNESOTA: The Minneapolis Star Tribune writes that yesterday’s “vigorous interrogations” by the state Supreme Court “left no decisive signals about the justices' thinking. They challenged the arguments of both candidates, but leveled their toughest questions at a lawyer for Coleman, who is appealing a lower court verdict awarding Minnesota's disputed Senate election to Franken.”
Both the Coleman and Franken lawyers urged observers not to read too much into the justices’ questions, the New York...( read more )
(link)
Tags:
Related Content
Live Blogging the Coleman Franken Oral Argument
electionlawblog.org 6/1/2009 — Now that the oral arguments have concluded, here are my tentative thoughts (you can find my earlier live blog below the fold): 1. It is always dangerous to guess how a court is going to come out based upon oral...
MN-Sen: Franken poised to win. Again.
dailykos.com 6/2/2009 — The Minnesota Supreme Court heard oral arguments today on sore-loser Norm Coleman's efforts to overthrow the will of the voters just because he wants to stay in office. It didn't go well for him, per election lawyer Rick Hasen: It is always ...
Bad News for Franken?
talkingpointsmemo.com 6/2/2009 — I hope I'm wrong. But Gov. Tim Pawlenty's (R) apparent decision not to seek reelection does not bode well for Al Franken's ability to get seated in the senate any time soon. That's because the most probable next step in the endless Franken-Coleman ...