Published 6/1/2009
at WSJ.com: Washington Wire
Naftali Bendavid reports on Congress.
Minnesotas Supreme Court justices closely questioned Norm Coleman s lawyer today on Colemans assertion that thousands more absentee ballots should be counted in the states U.S. Senate race, even though they were excluded because they were filled out improperly.
Coleman, a Republican who held the Senate seat until January, is contesting Democrat Al Franken s 312-vote lead out of nearly 3 million cast. But the justices asked whether they could overturn the election given that there are no allegations of widespread fraud or wrongdoing.
The issue is whether there has been intentional and purposeful discrimination, said Justice A lan Page . Where is the intentional and purposeful discrimination?
The Supreme Court is expected to rule within weeks, possibly bringing an end to the states extraordinary seven-month review of an election dispute that has left Minnesota with only one senator and the Senate without its full complement of lawmakers.
...
(link)
Tags:
Related Content
Live Blogging the Coleman Franken Oral Argument
electionlawblog.org 6/1/2009 — Now that the oral arguments have concluded, here are my tentative thoughts (you can find my earlier live blog below the fold): 1. It is always dangerous to guess how a court is going to come out based upon oral...
Esme's Blog
cbslocalblogs.prospero.com 6/1/2009 — Put William Mitchell Professor Raleigh Levine in the list of Minnesota legal and political experts who think Al Franken will prevail in the Minnesota Supreme Court and that Norm Coleman has little chance of getting his case heard in federal court. ...
Senate Race Will Now Be Decided by Judges
politicalwire.com 6/1/2009 — The Minnesota Supreme Court heard an hour of arguments on whether absentee ballot problems justify reversing a lower-court ruling that declared Al Franken (D) the winner over Norm Coleman (R) in last year's U.S. Senate race, according to the ...
Minnesota Supremes Put Franken's Lawyer On The Spot
tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com 6/1/2009 — As part two of our review of today's proceedings at the Minnesota Supreme Court, where oral arguments were heard in Norm Coleman's appeal of his defeat at the election trial, let's take a look at lead Franken attorney Marc Elias' rebuttal.
Elias ...