Published 6/29/2009
at L.A. Times - Politics
Justices rule, 5-4, that New Haven, Conn., was wrong to deny promotions to the firefighters, who outscored black colleagues on a test. The decision overturns a ruling supported by Sonia Sotomayor.
>
The Supreme Court ruled today that white firefighters who lost promotions in New Haven, Conn., were victims of illegal racial discrimination, holding that employers should not rely on "raw racial statistics" to set aside a fair test.
(link)
Tags:
Related Content
Conservative Activist Revels in Court Ruling Against "Sotomayer"
tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com 6/29/2009 — Conservative reactions to the Supreme Court's Ricci ruling are trickling in. Wendy Long, the leading face of the Sotomayor opposition, posted a press release on the web site for the Judicial Confirmation Network. The best part is the misspelling of ...
The Judicial Confirmation Network
judicialnetwork.com 6/29/2009 — NOT EVEN ONE JUSTICE APPROVED SOTOMAYER IN RICCI CASE Statement from Wendy E. Long, counsel to the Judicial Confirmation Network, on U.S. Supreme Court decision in Ricci v. DeStefano June 29, 2009 "Frank Ricci finally got his day in court, despite the ...
Ricci ruling
washingtonmonthly.com 6/29/2009 — RICCI RULING.... The Supreme Court this morning did pretty much what everyone expected it to do, ruling that New Haven, Conn., was wrong to deny promotions to white firefighters in the Ricci case. New Haven was wrong to scrap a...
9-0 Against Sotomayor
bench.nationalreview.com 6/29/2009 — In footnote 10 of her dissent, Justice Ginsburg, agreeing with the position that President Obamarsquo;s Department of Justice took, states:nbsp; ldquo... . . .
Raising the SCOTUS confirmation stakes —
First Read 6/29/2009
From NBC's Pete Williams
While the Supreme Court did reverse the ruling that Sonia Sotomayor joined in the New Haven case, it also raised the stakes for getting her confirmed early.The court today took the unusual step of holding one case back ...