Leave a Comment

Roger Ailes — How Can You Possibly Argue With Logic Like This? Let's have a look at the evidence in question. First and foremost, the spring 1996 issue of New Party News, the leading publication of the New Party at the time, clearly claims that Barack Obama is a party member. If the New Party didn't actually have members, why would the chief party organ claim that it did? Again, logically, how can a political party exist without members? Air-fuckin'-tight.

Choosing Corsi
Ben Smith's Blog — ... Stanley Kurtz takes my short item last night on the New Party as symbolic of everything that's wrong with the coverage of Obama: "a bias against conservative concerns, combined with an utterly incurious and credulous acceptance of even the most questionable assertions by Obama supporters." ...

OBAMA: THE NEW LEFT TRIUMPHANT
Right Wing Nut House — ... low with the correct interpretation of the candidate’s radical associations. Many on the right have made the mistake of pegging Obama himself as a wild eyed radical determined to create some kind of Marxist state out of America. I believe this wildly overstates the case. The danger of Obama is in his “soft” radicalism – a squishy new leftism where he doesn’t have the political courage to annunciate his true agenda while hiding behind banal platitudes and sugary rhetoric. Kurtz, in going after Ben Smith of Politico who quoted one of the co-founders of the New Party Joel Rogers ...