vote down
flag
scotusblog.com - 3/10/2009
—
Analysis
Two starkly differing views of the contemporary role of race in American politics emerged in full view in the Supreme Court’s wide-ranging new ruling on federal voting rights law. Both views start with the same premise, but end up in markedly different conclusions. Again, the ...
scotusblog.com - 3/9/2009
—
scotusblog.com —
Dividing 5-4, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday
that federal voting rights law does not require the...
creation of a new legislative district when that would include a racial minority group that has less than 50 percent of the population, as a remedy ...
(more)
Court rules against minority districts
Comments
vote down
ACSBlog: The Blog of the American Constitution Society
found this 3/9/2009found this
scotusblog.com - 3/4/2009
—
scotusblog.com —
Analysis Tugged between a sense that a constitutional
ruling on judges’ duty to take themselves out of...
cases if bias is suspected should provide very clear guidance, and a sense that it might be written only to apply in the most extreme ...
(more)
Analysis: In search of a limiting principle
Comments
vote down
ACSBlog: The Blog of the American Constitution Society
found this 3/4/2009found this
Comments
Blog Reactions
SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST MINORITY DISTRICTS: “Dividing 5-4, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday th…
Instapundit —
... “Dividing 5-4, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that federal voting rights law does not require the creation of a new legislative district when that would include a racial minority group that has less than 50 percent of the population, as a remedy when minority voters’ rights have been diluted.” More here, from Lyle Denniston. ...
Related Content