vote down
flag
mediamatters.org - 3/10/2009
—
Call it The Washington Post 's 766-word non-correction
correction.
It ran Saturday in the form of a
Paul Farhi article about the dubious nature of trying to measure the size
of Rush Limbaugh's radio audience. Farhi stressed that trying to determine the
total number of weekly listeners ...
huffingtonpost.com - 3/8/2009
—
huffingtonpost.com —
Newt Gingrich became the highest profile Republican yet
to push back against Rush Limbaugh, saying on "Meet...
the Press" that it's "irrational" to hope for the President of the United States to fail. "You've got to want the president to succeed," ...
(more)
Gingrich Takes On Rush: Hoping For Prez's Failure Is ...
thenextright.com - 3/9/2009
—
thenextright.com —
These haven't been the best couple of weeks
for Rush Limbaugh, Michael Steele, or Bobby Jindal. (OK,...
let's carve out a possible exception for Limbaugh.) What these three people have in common is that they're all significant figures who have taken ...
(more)
Defending Rush, Steele, and Jindal
sundriesshack.com - 3/8/2009
—
sundriesshack.com —
I’ve not written much about the Rush Limbaugh
controversy that the White House has cooked up but,...
given the direction the argument has been moving among conservatives, it’s probably time...
(more)
Rush’s Critics Need to Read What He Actually Said.
Comments
Blog Reactions
US Political News Blog — Must Read Eric Boehlert discusses radio ratings.
What are Rush's ratings?
Michael Calderone's Blog —
... Media Matters'Eric Boehlert dubbed Farhi’s follow-up a “766-word non-correction correction,” and wrote that “the thin sourcing that Kurtz used for his claim was little more than a hunch, and the person who made the hunch didn't think the guesstimate of Limbaugh's size growth was scientific or that it represented a true ratings estimate.” ...
Related Content


