Submit a Story!
Economy Made Few Gains in Bush Years
President Bush has presided over the weakest eight-year span for the U.S. economy in decades, according to an analysis of key data, and economists across the ideological spectrum increasingly view his two terms as a time of little progress on the nation's thorniest fiscal challenges.
Bush Lead During Weakest Economy in Decades
washingtonpost.com — Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. ... (more) Bush Lead During Weakest Economy in Decades
The Bush Economy
The Bush Economy
online.wsj.com — President Bush is leaving office amid the worst recession in 25 years, and naturally his economic policies are getting the blame. But before we move on to the era of Obamanomics, it's important to understand what really happened during the Bush years ... (more) The Bush Economy
 bush (video)
Play
bush (video)
youtube.com — bush (more) bush (video)
Comments
Blog Reactions

Few Economic Gains During the Bush Years
The Page by Mark Halperin — ... His term was the weakest eight-year span in the U.S. economy for decades.       ...

Economy Made Few Gains in Bush Years, Eight-Year Period Is Weakest in Decades
Democratic Underground Latest Breaking News — ... with the idea of an "ownership society," have proved unsustainable. "The expansion was a continuation of the way the U.S. has grown for too long, which was a consumer-led expansion that was heavily concentrated in housing," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a onetime Bush White House staffer and one of Sen. John McCain's top economic advisers for his presidential campaign. "There was very little of the kind of saving and export-led growth that would be more sustainable." Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...

Zandi: The "Lost Economic Decade"
Calculated Risk — "It's sad to say, but we really went nowhere for almost ten years, after you extract the boost provided by the housing and mortgage boom. It's almost a lost economic decade." Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Economy.com From the WaPo: Economy Made Few Gains in Bush Years President Bush has presided over the weakest eight-year span for the U.S. economy in decades, according to an analysis of key data ... We will probably see a slew of articles over the next ten days on the various failures of the Bush ...

At least James Buchanan
Firedoglake — ... A great sense of accomplishment indeed: President Bush has presided over the weakest eight-year span for the U.S. economy in decades, according to an analysis of key data, and economists across the ideological spectrum increasingly view his ...

ThinkFast: January 12, 2009
Think Progress — ... “It does look like a great eight years, aside from the last quarter, unfortunately,” said Ed Lazear, chairman of Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers. “In the long term, things look good. The reason things look good is this economy will rebound, and it will rebound strongly.” ...

The Early Word: Transition Winds Down
The Caucus — ... that both the incoming and outgoing presidents are on board with the plan, while some “lawmakers in both parties are furious over the Bush administration’s handling of the bailout and some have pledged to block the money.” In the president-elect’s early emphasis on the economy, he is hoping to avoid the kind of news that President Bush is contending with during his last full week in office, including the Washington Post’s conclusion that Mr. Bush “presided over the weakest eight-year span for the U.S. economy in decades.” From the Post’s Neil Irwin and Dan Eggen: The number ...

For the Defense
Matthew Yglesias — ... This Washington Post article on how “President Bush has presided over the weakest eight-year span for the U.S. economy in decades” is pretty great. The best part is the Bush Team’s pathetic defense of their record: ...

Bush's Economic Legacy
The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan — ... This WaPo piece is devastating. The collapse of job-creation, the still hard-to-fathom increase in public borrowing and spending, the failure to resolve any long-term fiscal problems (indeed a massive worsening of them), and the toleration of a bubble economy: put in historical context, the Bush-Cheney years seem even worse. Tax cuts did not help mend structural problems. That much needs to sink in with those of us who supported them. ...

ThinkFast: January 12, 2009
The Hollywood Liberal — ... , other than that of Bush’s father.” “It does look like a great eight years , aside from the last quarter, unfortunately,” said Ed Lazear, chairman of Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers. “ In the long term, things look good . The reason things look good is this economy will rebound, and it will rebound strongly.” Roll Call reports that some top business lobbyists are privately grumbling “that they lack ...

Assessing Bush: The Economy
BlueOregon — "It's sad to say, but we really went nowhere for almost ten years, after you extract the boost provided by the housing and mortgage boom.  It's almost a lost economic decade." --Mark Zandi, Chief Economist at Moody's On Monday I began a series of posts on the Bush years, starting with a look at the administration's handling of foreign policy.  The Iraq war will be one of a small number of major initiatives against which history will judge the Bush administration; ...

The Bush Record
Matthew Yglesias — ... Notice anything? I mean, it’s true that Bush’s record in keeping the United States safe from terrorism is good if you ignore the failure. On the economy, they make the same claim. Sure, Bush has overseen the worst performance ever but if you ignore the recessions, times were pretty good! ...

Opposing Obama on Stimulus, Republicans Party Like It's 1993
Crooks and Liars — ... . George W. Bush, too, saw the federal government hemorrhage red ink and presided over the worst eight-year economic record of any modern American president. Meanwhile, Democrat Bill Clinton's ...

Related Content
o bush (video)
youtube.com 1/17/2009 — o bush
Bush On Economy And Iraq: Don't Blame Me! (video)
youtube.com 12/17/2008 — http://thinkprogress.org/2008/12/15/bush-legacy-no-responsib ility
Obama to Address the Economy
politicalwire.com 1/8/2009 — Here's a brief excerpt from President-elect Obama's speech on the economy scheduled for 11 a.m. ET at George Mason University: "I don't believe it's too late to change course, but it will be if we don't take dramatic action as soon as possible.  ...
Bush: Economy on track to recovery
msnbc.msn.com 1/16/2009 — President George W. Bush said Friday  he believes steps taken by his administration have "laid the groundwork for a return to economic growth and job creation."
Michelle: Bush “pre-socialized” the economy for Obama
hotair.com 1/9/2009 — A point you’ll doubtless hear made by Democrats come 2010 if, as expected, the stimulus hasn’t done much stimulating. [...] Read the rest »
Thank You President Bush
noholdsbarred.info 1/16/2009 — President Bush--A president who is leaving office after two terms, a President that the majority of Americans are more than willingly to say "Good Bye, Adios, or Good Riddance".
Video - Obama: Economy 'bad and getting worse'
politicalnewslive.blogspot.com 1/6/2009 — President-elect Barack Obama declared the national economy was 'sick' Monday as he began crisis talks with congressional leaders on emergency action. Mark Smith reports from The White House.
Black Families Showing Gains?
corner.nationalreview.com 12/18/2008 — The New York Times headline "2-Parent Black Families Showing Gains," Wednesday seemed like great news. ( Full disclosure: I am briefly quoted in the article.) After decades of decline, more black kids are finally growing up with their mothers and ...
Obama Presses for Action on Economy
nytimes.com 1/8/2009 — A recession could last for years unless a stimulus plan is passed, Barack Obama said on Thursday. >
Release of More Bailout Money Gains Favor
nytimes.com 1/13/2009 — Despite skepticism from some senators, party leaders signaled that they would support the release of the second half of the $700 billion fund. >