Leave a Comment

In 2 new Supreme Court cases — one a clear conservative-liberal split and one decidedly not — the government wins and the criminal defendant loses.
Althouse — Here's Herring v. United States: Officers in Coffee County arrested petitioner Herring based on a warrant listed in neighboring Dale County’s database. A search incident to that arrest yielded drugs and a gun. It was then revealed that the warrant had been recalled months earlier, though this information had never been entered into the database.... Held: When police mistakes leading to an unlawful search are the result of isolated negligence attenuated from the search, rather than systemic error or reckless disregard of constitutional ...

No Suppression For Search Following Arrest on Withdrawn Warrant
TalkLeft — ... In a 5-4 decision today, the Supreme Court further eroded our Fourth Amendment protections by holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to searches that follow an unlawful arrest pursuant to a warrant that, although withdrawn, still appears to be active in police databases. On its surface the result seems reasonable -- the police do not deliberately violate rights when they make arrests in the good faith belief that their databases are accurate -- but in practice the decision will lead to pernicious results. ...

Sotomayor, Santa and Souter:
The Volokh Conspiracy — ... not apply to evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment where the police relied, in good faith, on erroneous information provided by court employees. Justice Souter joined the majority opinion in Evans , and also joined concurring opinions by Justices O'Connor and Breyer, the former of which was explicitly cited by Judge Sotomayor in Santa . The suggestion that Santa indicates Judge Sotomayor would be to Justice Souter's right comes from Justice Souter's dissent in Herring v. United States , a case decided this past January. [For more on Herring , see Orin's ...