Submit a Story!
HIRABAYASHI V. UNITED STATES, 320 U. S. 81 (1943) -- US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/320/81/ Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/320/81/case.html U.S. Supreme Court Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) Hirabayashi v. United States No. 870 Argued May 10, 11,1943 Decided June 21,1943 320 U.S. 81 CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Syllabus 1. Where a ...
Comments
Blog Reactions

The Biggest Lie of the Greatest Generation
Is That Legal? — ... The article presents important new archival findings about Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943), which upheld the constitutionality of a racial curfew imposed on Japanese Americans in World War II. The Court concluded that because of the enormous security threat facing the United States -- a threatened invasion of the West Coast by Japan in the months after the Pearl Harbor attack -- the ordinary constitutional prohibition on "discrimination based on race alone" was not controlling. The Court emphasized the threat of an invasion because that is what the ...

Hirabayashi Hoax:
The Volokh Conspiracy — Was there ever a real threat the Japanese would invade the Pacific coast during World War II? Historians think not, but with the benefit of hindsight. In 1943, however, military attorneys argued otherwise, maintaining the threat was serious and justified a racial curfew on those of Japanese descent (including Japanese Americans). These arguments helped persuade the Supreme Court, which held in Hirahayashi v. United States that the curfew was constitutional given the severity of the threat. But did the military ever really fear a Japanese invasion? A new paper by Eric Muller ...

The Beltway, War and Civil Liberties
TalkLeft — ... In Hirabayashi, the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a curfew statute passed by the Congress and administered by the President aimed expressly and solely at Japanese-Americans. It was a triple failure of our government and our people and an everlasting stain on FDR, on the leading Congressmen of the time and on those Justices who voted in the majority in Hirabayashi and Korematsu. Justice Robert Jackson dissented in Korematsu: ...

The Goldsmith Variations
Power Line — ... wiretapping program was not blessed by congressional consultation. Neither rhetoric nor public symbols were invoked to support it. During the war, President Roosevelt did not seem particularly moved by constitutional limits or self-imposed restraint. To take just one example, consider the detention of Japanese American citizens that took place on his order. It took place under the authority of Executive Order 9066 without let or hindrance by the Supreme Court in Hirabayashi and Korematsu . Was this because of Roosevelt">Korematsu . Was this ...

Related: hirabayashi v. united states, circuit court
Possible Good News
obsidianwings.blogs.com 8/15/2008 — by hilzoy From the Center for Constitutional Rights (h/t Anderson): "The Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued an extremely rare order that the case of Canadian rendition victim Maher Arar would be heard en banc by all of the active judges on ...
Detainee torture issue taken to CourtSCOTUSblog
In the first move to put claims of torture of detainees before the Supreme Court, lawyers for four Britians formerly held at Guantanamo Bay on Friday asked the Justices to overturn a federal appeals court ruling that they had no right to sue Pentagon officials and military officers over the issue. (The petition will be linked here shortly.) The D.C. Circuit Court last Jan. 11 rejected all ...
School Lawsuit Shot DownThe Great Plains Observer
The constitutionality question of the lawsuit brought forward by a majority of South Dakota’s school districts seeking increased funding was shot down today by Circuit Court Judge Lori Wilbur because it was ruled they cannot use tax dollars to help fund the suit. Circuit Judge Lori Wilbur of...
Victory for Clean Air ActDemocratic Underground Latest Breaking News
Source: [b]Nytimes[/b] A federal appeals court on Tuesday threw out an Environmental Protection Agency rule limiting the ability of states to require monitoring of industrial emissions. The 2-to-1 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is the most recen...
Appeals Court Sides With School's Ban On Confederate Flag ClothingACSBlog: The Blog of the American Constitution Society
In a narrowly crafted opinion, a federal appeals court upheld a Tennessee public school’s ban on students wearing clothing with the Confederate flag. The Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Barr v. Lafon concluded that school officials were justified in banning the divisive symbol. The appeals court said it found that the “school’s dress code as applied to ban the ...
Judicial Biography Needed:The Volokh Conspiracy
Every modern Supreme Court Justice becomes the subject of one or more judicial biographies. It's a different picture in the court of appeals. Circuit Court Judges occasionally become the subject of...
Good NewsSuburban Guerrilla
Well, it’s about time! Critics of the government’s secret no-fly list scored a potentially important victory Monday when a federal appeals court ruled that would-be passengers can ask a judge and jury to decide whether their inclusion on the list violates their rights. In a 2-1 ruling, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco reinstated a suit by a former ...
Court Will Not Release Minor (To See His Dying Wife)Democratic Underground Latest Breaking News
Source: [b]Sun-Herald (MS)[/b] [b]Court will not release Minor Appeals judges say he's a danger[/b] By ANITA LEE - calee@sunherald.com Former Biloxi attorney Paul Minor may endanger the public's safety if released pending appeal of his judicial bribery conviction, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court ...
(9th Circuit) Court: Passengers can challenge no-fly listDemocratic Underground Latest Breaking News
Source: [b]San Francisco Chronicle[/b] Critics of the government's secret no-fly list scored a potentially important victory Monday when a federal appeals court ruled that would-be passengers can ask a judge and jury to decide whether their inclusion on the list violates their rights. In a 2-1 r...
OBAMA VERSUS THOMAS: ONE MONTH LATER, THE WSJ AGREES WITH TABTHE ASTUTE BLOGGERS
WSJ: By the time he was nominated, Clarence Thomas had worked in the Missouri Attorney General's office, served as an Assistant Secretary of Education, run the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and sat for a year on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation's second most prominent court. Since his "elevation" to the High Court in 1991, he has also shown himself to be a ...
US Court: Saudis Not Liable For 9/11 AttacksPat Dollard | Young Americans
Court cites ‘immunities act’ as basis for ruling August 15, 2008 NEW YORK (Agencies) A federal appeals court has ruled Saudi Arabia could not be held liable for the September 11 attacks against the United States despite charitable donations that ended up in the hands of al-Qaeda. Upholding a 2006 decision by a lower court, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in ...
Kilpatrick will stand trial for alleged assaultDemocratic Underground Latest Breaking News
Source: [b]The Detroit News[/b] DETROIT -- A Detroit judge bound Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick over to Wayne County Circuit Court for trial on assault charges Friday after a preliminary examination that lasted more than five hours. Judge Ronald Giles of the 36th District Court made the ruling ...