curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com - 3/9/2009
—
FDIC chairman Sheila Bair doesn't think a full government takeover of Citigroup and other multinational financial institutions is practical or even possible. Here are her reasons, as summarized by Pete Davis : 1. The legal authority to take over large banks does not currently extend to ...
curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com - 3/16/2009
—
curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com —
Writing (and charting) about the latest employment numbers
a couple of weeks ago, I concluded that: It's...
probably still nowhere near as dramatic a chart as the monthly numbers from 1931 and 1932 would make. But the BLS wasn't on the case back then. ...
(more)
On the job front, this is no Great Depression. Not even ...
online.wsj.com - 3/6/2009
curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com - 3/3/2009
—
curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com —
Proponents of the nationalization of troubled big banking
companies like Citigroup generally make the case that the...
work should be done with dispatch and the banks returned promptly to private hands. But the test case for nationalization, AIG, is ...
(more)
Why the AIG bailout just keeps getting bigger :: The ...
Comments
Blog Reactions
The WonkLine: March 9, 2009
Wonk Room —
... Justin Fox looks to find out “how much of Citigroup was a domestic commercial bank that the FDIC could take over, and how much was multinational financial stuff outside the FDIC’s jurisdiction.” ...
Can Obama Legally Take Over Citi?
The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan —
... FDIC chairman Sheila Bair doesn't think so. Justin Fox looks at how much of Citigroup was a "domestic commercial bank that the FDIC could take over, and how much was multinational financial stuff outside the FDIC's jurisdiction." Read it all. It's a very important aspect of the debate that needs further exploration. Fox concludes: ...
Stunning Doses Of Reality
JustOneMinute —
The them of nationalizing Citi is exposed to two reality tests. First, Justin Fox at TIME stares at the Citi balance sheet and tries to figure out how much of this global whale is actually beached in the US: This made me curious as to how much of Citigroup was a domestic commercial bank that the FDIC could take over, and how much was multinational financial stuff outside the FDIC's jurisdiction. So I took a look at the balance sheet from Citi's ...
How Does One Say "No Mas" in Swedish?
JustOneMinute —
... an alternative view of the same reality - after studying Citigroup's $2 trillion of US and overseas assets, he concluded that FDIC has authority over roughly 25% of the group: But this would leave an entity (or entities) with about $1.5 trillion in assets and $1.4 trillion in liabilities to be taken over by foreign governments or fail in pretty much the same unruly manner that Lehman Brothers did. Have fun storming the bank, boys. I will admit - I am experiencing shock and awe at the level of leverage in the latest proposal (and ...
The Devil Is In The Details
JustOneMinute —
... preferred solution is to rely on the wisdom and forbearance of the Congress we saw in action last week and nationalize some troubled banks. Why does he think this will work? Well, in the early 90's Sweden nationalized two banks on the periphery of global finance that no one has ever heard of; therefore, the US ought to be able to run Citigroup, Bank of America, and a few regional stragglers without a hiccup. No, I'm serious: Groan - how do you say "No Mas" in Swedish? As Justin Fox of TIME explained to the reality-based community, Citigroup has roughly $2 trillion in ...
Saving The "Non-Banks?"
TalkLeft —
... cites Justin Fox on why CitiGROUP can't be taken over. I think Geek misunderstands that I do not want CitiGroup taken over, I want CitiBANK taken over. However, he believes CitiBANK is not insolvent. The question is why isn't CitiBANK lending? Do they need more liquidity? That seems implausible in light of the fact that the ...
Related Content
Death to Citigroup
opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com 2/26/2009 — Calls for the government to take control of Citigroup are getting louder.
Citigroup to Sell $12 Billion of FDIC-Backed Bonds (Update1)
bloomberg.com 1/23/2009 — Jan. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc. plans to sell $12 billion of notes guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. as Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit ’s tries to bolster capital and save the bank from insolvency. The sale would be the ...
C - Citigroup Inc.
- Google Finance
google.com 2/23/2009 — Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) is a diversified global financial services holding company whose businesses provide a range of financial services to consumer and corporate customers. Citigroup is a bank holding company. As of March 31, 2008, Citigroup was ...
Why Doesn't the Government Own Citigroup Outright?
prospect.org 2/24/2009 — The coverage of the negotiations over switching the government's preferred shares in Citigroup to common shares has been awful. It treats this issue as a purely technical question. It isn't. It is a question about handing taxpayer dollars to ...
Super-FDIC
talkingpointsmemo.com 3/22/2009 — From Fed Chairman Bernanke's speech yesterday in Phoenix ...
Finally, an important element of addressing the too-big-to-fail problem is the development of an improved resolution regime in the United States that permits the orderly resolution of a ...
FDIC Bill Dodges a New TARP Fight
online.wsj.com 3/7/2009 — A bill designed to bolster the FDIC could let the Obama administration sidestep securing more financial firepower without opening a debate over TARP.
U.S. Agrees to Raise Its Stake in Citigroup
nytimes.com 2/27/2009 — In its most daring bid yet to stabilize Citigroup , one of the nation’s largest and most troubled financial institutions, the Treasury Department announced on Friday that it would vastly increase its ownership of the struggling company. After two ...