Blog Reactions
QandO: Will 2010 Be A Bad Foreign Policy Year For Obama?
Instapundit: BACK TO THE FUTURE: 1978 all over again? “Why did things go south for Carter so fast? Because Amer…
| RT @girlygirl007: Since we have another Carter, do we get another Reagan? - http://bit.ly/Dh2zf //Hopefully 27 days ago |
| James Carafano: Why 1978 was a very bad year | Washington Examiner: http://bit.ly/3GFVSf via @addthis 10/27/2009 |
| interesting re: BHO & Carter -- James Carafano: Why 1978 was a very bad year | Washington Examiner: http://bit.ly/3GFVSf 10/27/2009 |
Will 2010 Be A Bad Foreign Policy Year For Obama?
QandO —
... I can’t help but think James Carafano is on to something in his comparison with Obama’s rather naive foreign policy with another naive foreign policy - that of Jimmy Carter. Why does Carafano feel that 2010 may be Obama’s 1978? ...
BACK TO THE FUTURE: 1978 all over again? “Why did things go south for Carter so fast? Because Amer…
Instapundit —
... BACK TO THE FUTURE: 1978 all over again? “Why did things go south for Carter so fast? Because America’s enemies had taken measure of the man during his first, change-filled year in office. They saw weaknesses they could exploit. In the second year, they made their move.” I’d say that at this point, a Carter-rerun is a best-case scenario. ...
James Earl Obama
Blogs For Victory —
Yep:
Why did things go south for Carter so fast? Because America’s enemies had taken measure of the man during his first, change-filled year in office. They saw weaknesses they could exploit. In the second year, they made their move.
In Year One, Carter invested all the international prestige of his presidency in diplomacy and image-making. His energy was dedicated almost exclusively to “making nice” on the world stage. It’s what drove his actions in the Israeli-Egyptian peace process, at strategic-arms limitation talks and in ...
James Earl Obama
Blogs For Victory —
Yep:
Why did things go south for Carter so fast? Because America’s enemies had taken measure of the man during his first, change-filled year in office. They saw weaknesses they could exploit. In the second year, they made their move.
In Year One, Carter invested all the international prestige of his presidency in diplomacy and image-making. His energy was dedicated almost exclusively to “making nice” on the world stage. It’s what drove his actions in the Israeli-Egyptian peace process, at strategic-arms limitation talks and in ...
Larwyn's Linx: Does the Supreme Court Still Sit?
Doug Ross @ Journal —
... Memo to Spitzer: Put a Sock in It : Examiner Plenty of Blame To Go Around for CNN's Rating Plunge : Driscoll Newspaper Circulation Circles the Drain : JWF Fox News Channel's Ratings Soar After White House Attack : NewsBusters Climate & Energy EPA putting the brakes on coal : Hot Air The Race Against Nothing : AT 'Save the planet, kill yourself' : BlogProf World Decline is a choice. But is it America's choice? : Hammer Why 1978 was a very bad year and 2010 could be, too : Examiner Labour wanted mass ...
