Submit a Story!
Killing Our Troops for Earmarks
My headline might seem over the top but as a military history buff, soldiers often do die for lack of fuel, ammunition and proper training: Senators diverted $2.6 billion in funds in a defense spending bill to pet projects largely at the expense of accounts that pay for fuel, ammunition and ...
Comments
Related Content
U.S. troop funds diverted to pet projects
washingtontimes.com 10/15/2009 — Senators diverted $2.6 billion in funds in a defense spending bill to pet projects largely at the expense of accounts that pay for fuel, ammunition and training for U.S. troops, including those fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to an ...
Obama Snafu: "More troops? Who knew?"
directorblue.blogspot.com 10/8/2009 — Oh, for the love of...Oh Dear God...Obama Didn't Know COIN Meant More Troops?One of the confusing things about Obama's hesitancy about adding troops to Afghanistan is that many thought this was settled back in March when the Administration announced a comprehensive new strategy focusing on ...
Troops supporting troops
mudvillegazette.com 10/26/2009 — Deployed Airmen at Joint Base Balad collect items for wounded troops evacuated out of theater - who never have time to pack for the trip. While important, the donated items are secondary - the most important thing the wounded warriors receive is the message that they aren't forgotten.
Transferring troops from Iraq for buildup in Afghanistan a costly shortcut
stripes.com 10/12/2009 — As President Barack Obama ponders whether or how to grant his Afghanistan commander’s urgent request for up to 60,000 more troops to expand the flagging war against Taliban insurgents, one obvious question arises: Why not simply transfer thousands of ...
Gates blames past lack of troops for Taliban edge
reuters.com 10/6/2009 — Arshad Mohammed and Matt Spetalnick WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates blamed the Taliban's revival on a past failure to deploy enough troops to Afghanistan and said U.S. forces would not withdraw whatever the result of President ...
How Many Troops to Secure Afghanistan?
thelede.blogs.nytimes.com 9/23/2009 — Now that word has leaked out that Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top American military commander in Afghanistan, has concluded that he will need more than 68,000 American troops to defeat the Taliban, the natural question is: how many foreign troops ...
Japan tells US it will stop Afghan refuelling mission (AFP)Yahoo! News: Politics News 10/15/2009
AFP - Japan has told the United States it will end a naval refuelling mission that supports the war in Afghanistan, a top defence official said Thursday, a month before President Barack Obama visits Tokyo.
Ukraine talking to U.S. on sharing radar data: reportReuters: Politics 10/15/2009
KIEV (Reuters) - Ukraine has begun talks with the United States on the possibility of Washington using information gathered by its radars, Interfax Ukraine cited Kiev's envoy as saying on Thursday.
Treasury Department freezes al-Qaida member assets (AP)Yahoo! News: Politics News 10/15/2009
AP - The Treasury Department says it is freezing the assets of a German national and al-Qaida member believed to be operating on the border of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
South Korea urges U.S. to approve trade pactReuters: Politics 10/15/2009
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States will be at a competitive disadvantage in the South Korean market unless Congress approves a bilateral free trade agreement signed two years ago, a Korean official said on Thursday.
U.S. brigade won't go to Iraq, speeding withdrawalReuters: Politics 10/16/2009
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Friday that it has scrapped plans to deploy a 3,500-member Army brigade to Iraq in January, accelerating a U.S. drawdown as the White House weighs sending more troop to Afghanistan.