Submit a Story!
Macca: The Beatles weren't that good
Macca: The Beatles weren't that good
PAUL McCartney says it's not surprising no one signed them when they formed in the 60s
Comments
Blog Reactions

Big Duh
Daily PunditSir Paul McCartney: The Beatles weren’t that good when we started out | The Sun |Showbiz|Bizarre SIR PAUL McCARTNEY admits THE BEATLES weren’t much cop when they first formed. Duh. Neither were the Stones, and Bob Dylan’s high school efforts weren’t all that great, either.

PAUL MCCARTNEY SAYS THE BEATLES WEREN’T THAT GOOD when they started out. I’ve heard that first Beat…
Instapundit — ... PAUL MCCARTNEY SAYS THE BEATLES WEREN’T THAT GOOD when they started out. I’ve heard that first Beatles demo and, well, it sucked. I wouldn’t have signed them either. Which only says that (1) the guy who did sign them had a great ear for raw talent; and (2) there’s no substitute for experience. ...

Related Content
Look! It's the BEATLES! (video)
youtube.com 9/6/2009 — Okay, only one Beatle. (one and a half?). This is the 3rd or 4th story I've submitted with a Ralph Nader tag. It just makes sense. It's not about him running for president. It just makes sense. Say, let's ask Yoko about the mono release of singles??? Extra points for spotting the "little book."
Bizarre legal defense after EMI sues over Beatles MP3 sales
arstechnica.com 22 days ago — Update A federal judge has issued a restraining order against BlueBeat.com and its parent company Original story When the news broke earlier this week that the so-famous-you've-never-heard-of-it BlueBeat.com was ...