Submit a Story!
Pinker's Stinker
Harvard psychology professor Steven Pinker has never been inclined to let the facts get in the way of his pet theories, as this NRO essay by my Ethics and Public Policy Center colleague Yuval Levin illustrates. In a New York Times op-ed today, Pinker speculates that Chief Justice Roberts's ...
Adverbial placement in the oath flub
languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu — Chief Justice John Roberts' administration of the presidential oath to Barack Obama was far from smooth. Early... reports differ in saying who stumbled: NBC and ABC say the flub was Roberts', while the AP says it was Obama's. I think both men were a bit ... (more) Adverbial placement in the oath flub
Fox News anchors harp on oath story that experts reportedly say is insignificant
mediamatters.org — During Fox News' coverage of President Barack Obama's January 20 inauguration, Chris Wallace, host of Fox News... Sunday , asserted, "I'm not sure that Barack Obama really is the president of the United States, because the oath of office is set in ... (more) Fox News anchors harp on oath story that experts ...
Roberts's Rules
tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com — Just wanted to highlight something I wrote yesterday about Chief Justice John Roberts and his inauguration flub.... President Obama (!) was gracious enough to exonerate him and even credit Roberts for helping him out. But it sure seemed like Roberts ... (more) Roberts's Rules
Comments
Blog Reactions

Whelan Responds to Pinker:
The Volokh Conspiracy — Ed Whelan responds to Steven Pinker's split-infinitive theory of Chief Justice Roberts' mistaken recitation of the presidential oath here : . . . In a New York Times op-ed today, Pinker speculates that Chief Justice Roberts’s “habit of grammatical niggling” explains his flubbing of the presidential oath. In particular, Pinker supposes that Roberts embraces the “split-verb myth”, which would bar insertion of an adverb between an auxiliary verb (e.g., “will”) and the main verb (e.g., “execute”). I agree with Pinker that the split-verb myth (as well as its subsidiary rule against ...

Related Content
Obama Takes Oath Again
politicalwire.com 1/22/2009 — White House Counsel Greg Craig released this statement: "We believe that the oath of office was administered effectively and that the President was sworn in appropriately yesterday.  But the oath appears in the Constitution itself.  And out ...
Chris Weigant: My Final Inaugural Report -- The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly
huffingtonpost.com 1/26/2009 — "It was a the best of times, it was the worst of times." Too trite? How about: "We must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America" (from Obama himself)? Maybe that's pretentious of me. OK, I've got it, ...
I Just Don't Get Some People
corner.nationalreview.com 10/24/2008 — Former Reagan solicitor general Charles Fried is voting for Obama because of Palin. Does anyone pay any attention to Obama and his veep? This election isn't all about what you think about Sarah Palin, after all. It strikes me as simply unserious ...
So Nice He Did It Twice: Obama Retakes Oath
blogs.wsj.com 1/24/2009 — Susan Davis reports on the White House. In a move that will disappoint burgeoning conspiracy theorists, President Barack Obama retook the oath of office this evening after Chief Justice John Roberts flubbed the words the first time on Tuesday. ...
Did John Roberts Screw Up The Oath On Purpose?
wonkette.com 1/20/2009 — Oh, this is sweet: Chief Justice John Roberts intentionally (allegedly!) fucked up the Presidential Oath, so the wingnuts could claim Obama really isn’t president, because he said the words in the wrong order. See, not only is Roberts a ...
Now and Then:
volokh.com 5/27/2009 — Dahlia Lithwick, The Rational Hysterics, today:...
Details on the Do-Over
talkingpointsmemo.com 1/22/2009 — From the press pool report: At 735 pm, Roberts administred the oath of office again to obama in the map room. Robert gibbs said the wh counsel, greg craig, believes the oath was fine Tuesday, but one word was out of sequence so they did this out ...
What Drives Republicans Insane About the Media
balloon-juice.com 1/22/2009 — This sort of nonsense : But the most telling moment of the whole event was not that rehearsed display of unity—it came when Chief Justice John Roberts accidentally rearranged Obama’s oath of office by putting the word ...
How Dahlia Litwick would like you to think about Supreme Court appointments: liberal = moderate, conservative = extreme.
althouse.blogspot.com 2/4/2009 — Dahlia Lithwick has this new piece about the kind of Justices we might expect Barack Obama to appoint to U.S. Supreme Court: The prospect of a liberal slot on the court being filled by a liberal president has some liberals dreaming big—as was ...
The Volokh Conspiracy
volokh.com 12/31/2008 — Chief Justice John Roberts Renews But Scales Back His Call for a Judicial Pay Increase: Chief Justice John Roberts has renewed his call for a federal judicial pay increase in his 2008 Year End Report on the Federal Judiciary. This is hardly a ...
In case you missed it: Here's the presidential oath of officeCNN Political Ticker 1/20/2009
(CNN) — Chief Justice John Roberts seemed to have some trouble administering the presidential oath of office Tuesday. Here is the actual oath in full, as laid out in Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution: "I do solemnly swear (or ...
POLITICAL HOT TOPICS: Thursday Jan. 22nd, 2009CNN Political Ticker 1/22/2009
CNN: Obama retakes oath of office after Roberts' mistake President Obama retook his oath of office Wednesday after Chief Justice John Roberts flubbed while delivering it at Tuesday's inauguration. CNN: Hillary Clinton sworn in as secretary of ...
Pending execution delayed re-administration of oathCNN Political Ticker 1/22/2009
(CNN) – Two court sources say President Obama’s oath of office wasn’t re-administered until Wednesday evening because Chief Justice John Roberts and the other Supreme Court justices were dealing with a pending execution in Texas. The Court ...