Submit a Story!
Supreme Court rejects inmates' right to have DNA test - The Boston Globe
Supreme Court rejects inmates' right to have DNA test - The Boston Globe
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said it is up to the states and Congress to decide who has a right to the genetic testing.
Court rejects DNA access claim
scotusblog.com — Spitting 5-4, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday that an individual whose criminal conviction has become final does... not have a constitutional right to gain access to evidence so that it can be subjected to DNA testing. (more) Court rejects DNA access claim
Supreme Court says Alaska rapist has no right to DNA test
Supreme Court says Alaska rapist has no right to DNA test
adn.com — Convicts have no constitutional right to DNA evidence testing that might prove their innocence after they have... been found guilty, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday in an Alaska case. (more) Supreme Court says Alaska rapist has no right to DNA test
Justices Rule Inmates Don’t Have Right to DNA Tests
Justices Rule Inmates Don’t Have Right to DNA Tests
nytimes.com — WASHINGTON — Convicts do not have a right under the Constitution to obtain DNA testing to try... to prove their innocence after being found guilty, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday. In a 5-to-4 decision, the court found against William G. Osborne, a ... (more) Justices Rule Inmates Don’t Have Right to DNA Tests

Comments
Blog Reactions

Morning No: No Prisoners
Open Left - Front Page — ... rights abuses maintained. - I'm not always Obama's biggest fan, but we are so damn lucky that Mike Pence and John McCain aren't handling our foreign policy right now. Dodged a bullet doesn't begin to cover it. - Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak says it's a good time for Arab-Israeli peace, and that Obama has made clear that it's politics, not values, that separate the US and the Middle East. - Justice John Roberts led the Supreme Court to deny that inmates have a constitutional right to DNA testing. - Worldwide protests marked Nobel ...

Something Like Justice
Suburban Guerrilla — Because, as we know, elected officials in all their wisdom are so much more even-handed about this sort of thing! WASHINGTON - Prisoners do not have a constitutional right to DNA testing after their conviction, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday, even though the technology provides an “unparalleled ability both to exonerate the wrongly convicted and to identify the guilty.’’ In the court’s first examination of how to treat the rapidly evolving field of biological testing, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for a majority that said it is up to ...

The Supreme Court & DNA Testings
The Corner on National Review Online — ... , of the Court's Osbourne decision . I'm actually torn on this one, and I'm more sympathetic to the dissenting justices than I usually am. But I'm also a believer that that lots of very bad things can be constitutional just as a lot of very good things can be unconstitutional. I'll read up more before I make up my mind about the constitutional aspects of all this. But, as a matter of public policy, I have long believed that the state has a real interest in providing DNA testing, particularly in capital cases, whenever it might exonerate the convicted. Ideally, such tests would ...

Related Content
Justices Rule Inmates Don’t Have Right to DNA Tests
feeds.nytimes.com 6/18/2009 — Convicts do not have a right under the Constitution to obtain DNA testing to try to prove their innocence long after being found guilty, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.
Prosecutors Block Access to DNA Testing for Inmates
nytimes.com 5/18/2009 — Prosecutors Block Access to DNA Testing for Inmates
Supreme Court Rules That Convicts Lack Constitutional Right to DNA Testing
washingtonpost.com 6/19/2009 — Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. ...
Globe union votes no - The Boston Globe
boston.com 6/9/2009 — Guild president Daniel Totten said he would not comment, until today, on the company's decision to implement the 23 percent pay cut. After the vote, Totten said in a statement: "With today's vote, members of the Boston Newspaper Guild have said that ...
SCOTUS: No to Post Conviction DNA Testing
outsidethebeltway.com 6/18/2009 — The Supreme Court has ruled (a 5-4 decision) that a person who has been convicted of a crime, and when there is DNA evidence present that could conclusively prove innocence or guilt and a DNA test has not been done, there is no Constitutional right to ...
Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
huffingtonpost.com 6/8/2009 — WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a challenge to the Pentagon policy forbidding gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military, granting a request by the Obama administration. The court said it will not hear an ...
Boston Globe Bids Due This Week: Report
huffingtonpost.com 7/6/2009 — BOSTON — A deadline is approaching for the possible sale of The Boston Globe. The New York Times Co., which owns the Globe, has set a Wednesday deadline for initial, nonbinding bids. That's according to a confidential letter sent by Goldman ...
Times Co. seeks Globe bids - The Boston Globe
boston.com 6/10/2009 — In the last two weeks, three of the newspaper's four major unions -- representing the mailers, the pressmen, and the delivery truck drivers -- ratified concessions giving $10 million back to the Times Co. The Guild -- the paper's largest union ...
Supreme Court rejects legal challenge to "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." It's time for Presidential leadership.
americablog.com 6/8/2009 — Today, the Supreme Court punted on its chance to overturn "Don't Ask, Don't Tell": The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a challenge to the Pentagon policy forbidding gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military, granting a request by the ...
What impact will Supreme Court decision on DNA evidence have?
csmonitor.com 6/19/2009 — The defendant's advocates decried the court's ruling against a convict's right to such evidence, but Attorney General Eric Holder suggested it would have a limited effect. By Warren Richey | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor from the June ...