npr.org - 10/17/2008
—
Nina Totenberg Morning Edition , January 9, 2008 Politics is front and center at the Supreme Court on Wednesday, as the justices examine the constitutionality of laws requiring voters to show a government-issued photo ID in order to cast a ballot. Although 24 states have enacted such laws in ...
washingtonpost.com - 10/16/2008
—
washingtonpost.com —
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or
other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from
the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. ...
(more)
Ohio Files Appeal to Supreme Court on Voter Registration ...
minx.cc - 10/16/2008
—
minx.cc —
In this case that means....Justice John Paul Stevens.
Ohio's top election official has asked the Supreme Court
to put on hold a federal judge's order requiring steps to verify the voter registration rolls across the state, arguing that the order...
(more)
Ohio Secretary Of State Appeals Voter Case To Supreme Court
Comments
Blog Reactions
There's No Such Thing As Voter Fraud
The Anonymous Liberal —
... of a single improper vote cast because of bad cards submitted in the course of a voter-registration effort. Republican campaign consultant Royal Masset says, "[I]n-person voter fraud is nonexistent. It doesn't happen, and ... makes no sense because who's going to take the risk of going to jail on something so blatant that maybe changes one vote?" ...
Taking the ACORN nonsense apart
Political Animal —
... of a single improper vote cast because of bad cards submitted in the course of a voter-registration effort. Republican campaign consultant Royal Masset says , "[I]n-person voter fraud is nonexistent. It doesn't happen, and ... makes no sense because who's going to take the risk of going to jail on something so blatant that maybe changes one vote?" There is no such thing as vote fraud. The ...
Related Content
Obama and the Supreme Court
corner.nationalreview.com 10/29/2008 — On NRO's home page today is my essay, "Obama and the Supreme Court: What's really at stake". I explain there that the current Supreme Court urgently needs to be improved in the direction of judicial restraint and that a President Obama would drive ...
California Supreme Court
nbclosangeles.com 12/20/2008 — Article Garden Grove Cops: Give That Pot Back Dec 2, 2008 | 5 comments The U.S. Supreme Court won't review a decision ordering Garden Grove police to return marijuana seized from a patient pulled over in a traffic stop... Article Calif. Supreme Court ...
Who would Obama pick for the Supreme Court? - Los Angeles Times
latimes.com 11/17/2008 — "I think Obama would want to make a statement with his Supreme Court justices. We hope for a justice who can replace the lost voice of an Earl Warren or Thurgood Marshall or William Brennan," said Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice, a ...
Exit polls: The Supreme Court
politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com 11/5/2008 — National exit polling shows 53 percent of of the voters considered the U.S. Supreme Court an "important factor" in their vote Tuesday. Fifty-two percent of these voters supported Barack Obama, while 46 percent supported John McCain. ...
Supreme Court Takes On Campaign Finance Case
nytimes.com 11/14/2008 — The Supreme Court will consider whether a film critical of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and advertisements for it are subject to campaign finance laws. >
Indiana Supreme Court Won't Stop Early Voting
tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com 10/24/2008 — The Indiana Supreme Court has declined to approve a bid by the GOP to shut down early voting centers in Democratic strongholds of a key county.
A lower court had similarly rejected the effort earlier this week. The Supreme Court ruled today that ...
Court weighs missing White House e-mail
msnbc.msn.com 11/17/2008 — How did White House e-mails go missing? A federal appeals court is cool to the idea of forcing the Bush administration to reveal records that might explain what happened.
Whelan: Obama and the Supreme Court
article.nationalreview.com 10/29/2008 — If Barack Obama is elected president, he will drive the Court further in the wrong direction, and the liberal judicial activists that he appoints will likely serve for two or three decades.
Follow BeltwayBlips on Twitter
