Submit a Story!
The Volokh Conspiracy
Akhil Amar on Heller: In the Supreme Court issue of the Harvard Law Review , Akhil Amar has a case comment on DC v. Heller that begins in this amusing way: Well, the show sure ended with a bang. On the last day of the Term, the Court — for the first time ever, by a single vote, over vigorous ...
The Volokh Conspiracy
volokh.com — "Judge Postpones Ruling In Lori Drew Case": Kim Zetter of Wired has the latest update in the... Lori Drew case, namely that Judge Wu decided not to rule at this time on the defense's latest motion to dismiss (this one specifically raising the lack of ... (more) The Volokh Conspiracy
 The Volokh Conspiracy
The Volokh Conspiracy
volokh.com — A Little Short on Specifics, No? The New York Times editorializes in favor of "sound gun-control laws."... Which ones? "Reasonable gun-control laws," which can now be enacted following the "gun lobby"'s defeat in November. (No word on the success of the ... (more) The Volokh Conspiracy
The Volokh Conspiracy
volokh.com — Eric Holder on firearms policy: Earlier this year, Eric Holder--along with Janet Reno and several other former... officials from the Clinton Department of Justice--co-signed an amicus brief in District of Columbia v. Heller. The brief was filed in ... (more) The Volokh Conspiracy
Comments
Blog Reactions

WHY HILLARY IS A GOOD CHOICE FOR STATE
THE ASTUTE BLOGGERS — ... Conventional wisdom on the right and the left doubts that HRC is a good choice for Secretary of State. Whether her nomination will be blocked by the emoluments issue is interesting, but the main problem most commentators have with her nomination, is that they feel the President must be firmly in control of the Nation's foreign policy "message," and they fear that Hillary will never be a reliable conduit for a President Obama's policies. ...

MORE ON HILLARY CLINTON AS SECRETARY OF STATE, and the emoluments clause….
Instapundit — MORE ON HILLARY CLINTON AS SECRETARY OF STATE, and the emoluments clause.

A tale told by idiots
The Reaction — ... were not raised at all, merely restored to their 1990s' level. However, a case could be made that any senator who sat in this past Congress would forever be barred from serving as secretary of state or any other Cabinet post. It seems pretty clear this clause was designed to prevent a quid pro quo situation. But, noooooooooooooooooooooo, that's not how the insane wing of America wants to play this! An example: ...

Unconstitutional, like Bentsen?
Ben Smith's Blog — ... (This doesn't mean that it's legally unquestionable. The Reagan Administration, Eugene Volkh writes, decided not to name Orrin Hatch to the Supreme Court in part based on a legal opinion that the Saxbe fix wouldn't do.) ...

Obama Ignores Constitution Prohibition Against Hillary Being Secretary of State
Flopping Aces — ... and Clinton all ignored the Constitution. They did it by lowering the pay after the fact. One of the Democrats favorite former KKK member, Robert Byrd, didn’t like this tactic in 1973 and said this: we should not delude the American people into thinking a way can be found around the constitutional obstacle But now that its the Democrats in power, and wanting Hillary in the SecState spot it’s all good. Professor Volokh quoted Prof. Michael Stokes Paulsen, author of Is Lloyd Bentsen Unconstitutional?, in his post ...

Clinton Appointment Unconstitutional
QandO — ... According to Prof. Michael Stokes Paulsen (via Eugene Volokh), how the salary was increased does not make Clinton’s appointment any more legal: ...

Related: amar and heller
Akhil Amar on Heller:The Volokh Conspiracy
In the Supreme Court issue of the Harvard Law Review, Akhil Amar has a case comment on DC v. Heller that begins in this amusing way:...