Submit a Story!
U.S. considers sending special ops to Afghanistan - Los Angeles Times
Reporting from Washington -- In a sign that the U.S. military is scaling back its goals in Afghanistan, senior Pentagon officials are weighing controversial proposals to send additional teams of highly trained special operations forces to narrowly target the most violent insurgent bands in the ...
More US troops to Afghanistan?
More US troops to Afghanistan?
csmonitor.com — Before sending more brave men and women there, let's question conventional wisdom. It will take more than... military might to succeed in Afghanistan. (more) More US troops to Afghanistan?
AFGHANISTAN: Can the U.S. kill its way to victory?
AFGHANISTAN: Can the U.S. kill its way to victory?
latimesblogs.latimes.com — As the debate over revamping U.S. policy in Afghanistan intensifies, Bing West has checked in with strong... views. West -- a Marine veteran of Vietnam, former assistant secretary of Defense in the Reagan administration and author of three books and... (more) AFGHANISTAN: Can the U.S. kill its way to victory?
Jurassic Trailer Park
Jurassic Trailer Park
michaelyon-online.com —   Road from Kabul to Jalalabad 20 October 2008 Afghanistan is like time traveling. Vast expanses of... rugged landscape, mostly unadorned by man-made structures, all framed by stories of savagery and conquest, create a picture of forever. A ... (more) Jurassic Trailer Park
Comments
Blog Reactions

U.S. considers sending special ops to Afghanistan
Democratic Underground Latest Breaking News — ... senior Pentagon officials are weighing controversial proposals to send additional teams of highly trained special operations forces to narrowly target the most violent insurgent bands in the country. The proposals are part of an acknowledgment among senior brass that a large-scale influx of conventional forces is unlikely in the near future because of troop commitments in Iraq. It also reflects the urgency to take some action to reverse recent setbacks in Afghanistan. Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fg-us...

Four to ponder.
Greatscat!U.S. considers sending special ops to Afghanistan -Despite recent setbacks, a large-scale influx of conventional forces is unlikely because of troop commitments in Iraq. But special operations forces could narrowly target the most violent insurgent bands. ...

Little Regard For International Boundaries
Newshoggers.com — ... helps the White House, if it is simply after a "freebie", that all of these incursions are being carried out by U.S. Special Operations forces, which have their own independent command structure (and an independent budget) headquartered in the U.S. - allowing Proconsul Petreaus and his subordinates to have some plausible denial of culpability when talking to local officials. But it's hardly likely to help long-term strategic planning. Still, the Bush administration now wants to send thousands more of these troops to Afghanistan, a move that ...

Pakistan, Afghanistan, Agree To Talk To Taliban
Newshoggers.com — ... As the U.S. plans to escalate its military component in the region, Pakistan and Afghanistan are moving to defuse the reasons for fighting as a high-level meeting of delegates from the two countries ...

Related Content
Afghanistan: Merging News and Psy-Ops
moonofalabama.org 11/30/2008 — This will likely get lost in future news from Afghanistan, so let us make sure we note it: Press And "Psy Ops" to Merge At NATO Afghan HQ: SourcesKABUL (Reuters) - The U.S. general commanding NATO forces in Afghanistan has...
Shakedown
michaelyon-online.com 11/18/2008 — By Tim Lynch Printed with permission from: http://blog.freerangeinternational.com/ Afghanistan We had to make a run to Kabul last Friday to take some clients to the airport and to pick up new ones. The Jalalabad to Kabul road is considered very ...
In Time of War
michaelyon-online.com 11/10/2008 — 10 November 2008 The Iraq war is over. Barring the unforeseen, the darkest days are behind, though we are still losing soldiers to low-level fighting with enemies that are true “dead-enders.” Last month we lost seven Americans in combat in Iraq.  ...
Taliban mock West for calling Afghanistan unwinnable
longwarjournal.org 10/14/2008 — Multimedia presentation of the senior Taliban commanders in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Click to view. The Taliban have seized on what US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates described as "defeatist" comments made by Western ...
Obama's Afghanistan Dilemma: "Growing Dissent" On More Troops
huffingtonpost.com 12/10/2008 — No more than one year ago, it was widely assumed that the great foreign policy challenge facing the next president would be what to do with U.S. troops in Iraq. The surge had produced a unexpected geopolitical dilemma: was the reduction of violence ...
The Associated Press: General: Urgent need for troops in Afghanistan now
ap.google.com 10/3/2008 — Oct 1, 2008 WASHINGTON (AP) The U.S. and its allies should rush more troops "as quickly as possible" to Afghanistan, the top American commander in that country said Wednesday, warning that the fighting could worsen before it get better. Trying to ...
Instapundit.com -
pajamasmedia.com 11/16/2008 — November 16, 2008 SMALL WARS JOURNAL: How Should the U.S. Execute a Surge in Afghanistan? Michael Yon emails the link and adds: "Last time I was in Afghanistan, I mentioned an off-the-cuff number that we might need something like 50k more troops. . . ...
Afghanistan-- Possibly Worse For Obama (And America) Than Even Rahm Emanuel
downwithtyranny.blogspot.com 12/8/2008 — Afghanistan: not a very nice place lately Yesterday the NY Times reported that the military is preparing a big troop buildup in Afghanistan . This could be a terrible miscalculation and I'm only slightly less worried about it under Obama than I ...
What, I Was Serious?
windsofchange.net 1/15/2009 — I saw this the other day, and waited for it to get picked up and commented on. It wasn't, so I'll raise it here. Here's Spencer Ackerman writing in the Washington Independent : Today a cohort of progressive bloggers unveils a new effort against ...
Afghanistan is NOT the Good War
thewashingtonnote.com 12/14/2008 — I will write much more about this subject in coming days, but I am increasingly worried about the framing that America's next President and his team are applying to Iraq and Afghanistan. To be blunt, they have been arguing that "Iraq was the ...
Bush signs NATO protocols for Albania, CroatiaReuters: Politics 10/24/2008
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush signed NATO agreements on Friday that put Albania and Croatia a step closer to joining the western security alliance, calling it a historic step for the Balkans.
Military Prepares for Threats During Presidential TransitionWash Post Elections 10/26/2008
The U.S. military, bracing for the first wartime presidential transition in 40 years, is preparing for potential crises during the vulnerable handover period, including possible attacks by al-Qaeda and destabilizing developments in Iraq or ...
An Iraqi Accord and a New U.S. PresidentWash Post Federal Page 10/27/2008
The status-of-forces agreement that would govern conduct of the U.S. military and its contractors in Iraq beyond 2008 would apparently tie the hands of the next U.S. president in some respects if it was ratified by the Iraqis before Jan. 20.
Back From War, and Increasingly Into the Political FrayNYT > Politics 10/27/2008
Young war veterans have become a growing, important part of the nation’s political dynamic, many engaged for the first time. >
Big foreign policy agenda awaits next presidentReuters: Politics 10/29/2008
NORFOLK, Virginia (Reuters) - The next U.S. president will face a daunting list of foreign policy challenges, from wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the global financial crisis to the need to shore up the country's frayed international image.  ...