Submit a Story!
US readying south Afghan surge against Taliban - Yahoo! News
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan The U.S. is preparing to pour at least 20,000 extra troops into southern Afghanistan to cope with a Taliban insurgency that is fiercer than NATO leaders expected. The new troops will augment the 12,500 NATO soldiers — mainly British, Canadian and Dutch — in what amounts to ...
Counterinsurgency Field Manual: Afghanistan Edition
foreignpolicy.com — or the past five years, the fight in Afghanistan has been hobbled by strategic drift, conflicting tactics, and too few troops. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael Mullen, got it right when he bluntly told the U.S. Congress in 2007, ... (more) Counterinsurgency Field Manual: Afghanistan Edition
Op-Ed Columnist: The Afghan Quagmire
Op-Ed Columnist: The Afghan Quagmire
nytimes.com — The time to go all out in Afghanistan was in the immediate aftermath of the 2001 terror attacks. That time has passed. > (more) Op-Ed Columnist: The Afghan Quagmire
Taliban suicide bomber strike in Pakistan, Afghanistan
longwarjournal.org — Taliban suicide bombers struck on both sides of the Durand Line, killing 51 and wounding score more in Pakistan and Afghanistan. The suicide attack in Pakistan took place in the settled district of Buner in the insurgency-infested Northwest ... (more) Taliban suicide bomber strike in Pakistan, Afghanistan
Comments
Blog Reactions

Surging Over the Cracks In Afghanistan
Newshoggers.com — ... The Surge in Iraq essentially became a plan to bribe militants with guns and barrowloads of cash to not attack US troops and that left the core corruption, graft and incompetencies of the Iraqi government untouched and thus left the seeds of future conflict while temporarily tamping down violence to a level which would still horrify anyone West of Beirut. The planned surge in Afghanistan is likely ...

Surging Over the Cracks In Afghanistan
Crooks and Liars — ... The Surge in Iraq essentially became a plan to bribe militants with guns and barrowloads of cash to not attack US troops and that left the core corruption, graft and incompetencies of the Iraqi government untouched and thus left the seeds of future conflict while temporarily tamping down violence to a level which would still horrify anyone West of Beirut. The planned surge in Afghanistan is likely ...

Related Content
The Surge in Afghanistan
agonist.org 1/12/2009 — The US will soon double the number of its troops in Afghanistan from about thirty thousand to sixty thousand, and several other NATO countries will also up their troop levels. The move comes with little surprise and considerable bipartisan support, ...
Get Afghanistan Right
dailykos.com 1/13/2009 — An ad hoc group of bloggers has come together for the purpose of opposing a U.S.-led escalation in Afghanistan that is slated to double the number of American troops there.   Organized by Alex Thurston at The Seminal and Robert Greenwald's ...
What, I Was Serious?
windsofchange.net 1/15/2009 — I saw this the other day, and waited for it to get picked up and commented on. It wasn't, so I'll raise it here. Here's Spencer Ackerman writing in the Washington Independent : Today a cohort of progressive bloggers unveils a new effort against ...
GetAfghanistanRight.com
washingtonindependent.com 1/12/2009 — Today a cohort of progressive bloggers unveils a new effort against the planned 20,000-troop increase of U.S. forces in Afghanistan. A website called GetAfghanistanRight, set up by bloggers at the Seminal and Brave New Films — and with the ...
Getting Afghanistan Right
agonist.org 1/14/2009 — Memo to President-Elect Obama: "Now it is folly to go against men who could not be kept under even if conquered, while failure would leave us in a very different position from that which we occupied before the enterprise." Thucydides, VI, 11. ...
Troop Surge in Afghanistan Means No Progressive Consensus
dailykos.com 2/21/2009 — President Barack Obama's Tuesday announcement that the U.S. will be adding 17,000 fresh troops to those already fighting in Afghanistan upended hopes among some progressives that the 60-day policy review he announced February 10 would be completed ...
More Troops for Afghanistan
attackerman.firedoglake.com 2/18/2009 — He promised to do so on the campaign trail, and now he's done it: President Barack Obama has approved a troop increase to Afghanistan. His just-released statement is below. Notice that the forces approved appears to be less than the 20,000-30,000 ...
AlJazeeraEnglish: Afghanistan 'top priority' for US
english.aljazeera.net 3/19/2009 — The conflict in Afghanistan is now the "top overseas military priority" for the new Obama administration and its greatest challenge, the US defence secretary has said. "There is little doubt that our greatest military challenge right now is ...
Obama's Afghanistan Dilemma: "Growing Dissent" On More Troops
huffingtonpost.com 12/10/2008 — No more than one year ago, it was widely assumed that the great foreign policy challenge facing the next president would be what to do with U.S. troops in Iraq. The surge had produced a unexpected geopolitical dilemma: was the reduction of violence ...
Thoughts on Afghanistan
corner.nationalreview.com 1/30/2009 — The Democrats, and President Obama in particular, have backed themselves into a corner in Afghanistan. For several years the Afghan effort served as the rhetorical counterpoint to the war in Iraq; since they did not want to support "Bush's War," it ...
Letters to the EditorChristian Science Monitor | Commentary 12/31/2008
Readers write about why the US must stabilize Afghanistan, making science teachers a priority in US schools, ending greyhound racing, and why a college degree may not necessarily lead to a job.