druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com - 3/4/2009
—
First, a minor correction. We lost by 6-3, not 6-2 (when you're typing fast you're all thumbs). We lost Kennedy, Thomas, and Breyer. We needed to win at least two of them. The court relied on two facts established by the trial: (1) that a stronger warning would have made a factual difference ...
law.cornell.edu - 3/4/2009
—
law.cornell.edu —
WYETH v. LEVINE (No. 06-1249) ___ Vt. ___,
944 A. 2d 179, affirmed. Syllabus Opinion [Stevens] Concurrence...
[Breyer] Concurrence [Thomas] Dissent [Alito] Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in ...
(more)
WYETH v. LEVINE
Comments
Blog Reactions
Wyeth v. Levine
Overlawyered —
... of the Supreme Court’s appropriate structural role to prevent individual states from expropriating the gains from interstate commerce.
Sell your pharmaceutical stocks now, because the Supreme Court just declared it open season on productive business. One should now fear the coming decision in the as-yet-to-be-briefed Clearinghouse v. Cuomo, and the effect that is going to have on an already battered banking economy, as well.
Beck and Herrmann have first thoughts, but are likely to be relatively quiet thereafter.
Tags: constitutional ...
Wyeth and Deference to Agencies:
The Volokh Conspiracy —
... claims like Levine’s obstruct the federal regulation of drug labeling. Congress has repeatedly declined to pre-empt state law, and the FDA’s recently adopted position that state tort suits interfere with its statutory mandate is entitled to no weight. Although we recognize that some state-law claims might well frustrate the achievement of congressional objectives, this is not such a case. The folks at the Drug and Device Law blog have some initial thoughts on the decision here .
Related: "wyeth v. levine"
Court allows drug label lawsuit
scotusblog.com 3/4/2009 — The Supreme Court, voting 6-3, ruled that federal approval of labels giving warnings about effects of drugs does not bar lawsuits under state law claiming inadequate warnings. The ruling came in the case of Wyeth v. Levine (06-1249).
Today’s Opinions | 3.4.09
scotusblog.com 3/4/2009 — The Court has released the opinion in Wyeth v. Levine (06-1249). The decision below, which held for the plaintiff Diana Levine, is affirmed, in an 6-3 opinion authored by Justice Stevens. Justice Breyer filed a concurring opinion. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. ...
Wyeth v. Levine —
Stubborn Facts
I agree with the majority, and to an even greater extent with Justice Thomas' concurrence, in Wyeth v. Levine , the latest in a series of preemption cases the court has decided in recent terms. 1 Thomas, like Prof. Rick Hills, 2 is right on the money in pointing out that these are cases, as ...
Clarence Thomas, Liberal? —
TPM Election Central
No, of course not. But the conservative jurist did side with the Ginsburg, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, and Breyer in th e case of Wyeth v. Levine. The court ruled that FDA approval doesn't insulate drug companies from law suits. Thomas wrote a separate opinion taking shots at the court's use of ...